Calgary Weir

Calgary Weir

A Poem by LawrenceRaybon
"

A ballad

"
Once upon a twilight fall
as climbing, I, a tree so tall
what is it that I see and hear?
The massacre of Calgary Weir.

And enemies in coats of red,
attack them all til each is dead,
and as it is, with I so near,
could see faces of Calgary Weir.

The mothers, daughters, fathers, sons
all slain by King; and blades and guns;
and so it was that soldiers shear
the souls of those of Calgary Weir.

And as the bodies cool, now stilled,
the Red Coats plunder house and field.
Oh, how they laugh and hoot and jeer,
yes, as they're burning Calgary Weir.

Then from the forest quite nearby,
what is it there that I espy?
It isn't fox, nor fowl or deer.
No, tis a one of Calgary Weir.

A crone so old, with back so bent,
but head held high with ill intent.
The soldiers look, but do not fear,
on this, the last of Calgary Weir.

Then the lady chants aloud,
as moon is swallowed by a cloud,
and in the black of missing sphere,
silence reins o'er Calgary Weir.

Then there comes a gentle rustle
as if rodents waking bustle,
and when the moon from cloud comes clear
I see the dead of Calgary Weir.

Each one had risen up once more.
The corpses claim their killer's core.
And soon I see red mist appear,
o'er the whole of Calgary Weir.

Then, down I climb, quick like a flash;
and away I run from demons, dash.
And though some others, they will sneer,
I leave alive from Calgary Weir!

And to this day I do not know,
for to that place I will not go,
if vengeful dead did disappear 
or if they walk in Calgary Weir...

© 2014 LawrenceRaybon


Author's Note

LawrenceRaybon
Tried to fix the rhythm some.

Changed the description from 'A story poem' to 'A ballad' as I inadvertently wrote a ballad!

I did away with all but one instance of the 'do verb' monstrosities. I really like the line
'if the dead did disappear' and so it is the only 'do verb' I kept.

I did my best to fix the tense issues. Since the narrator is first person telling a story I ran into issues where he describes a thing and goes back and explains. When he first describes I try to keep it present tense but when he goes back to explain I switch to past tense as I believe a actual person would. For example:

And soldiers, they in coats of red,
attack them all til each is dead,
and as it is, with I so near,
could see the faces of Calgary Weir.

The mothers, daughters, fathers, sons
all slain by Queen; and blades and guns;
and so it was that they did shear
the souls of those of Calgary Weir.

The first stanza is in present and the second stanza is in past tense, because the villagers are already dead by the time the narrator gets to the second stanza.

In any case I know this piece had some tense issues, so I wanted to explain my reasoning behind the tense shifting I let in place.

What do you think?

My Review

Would you like to review this Poem?
Login | Register




Featured Review

This is clearly a ballad, a story poem as you call it. It is written in couplets of iambic tetrameter, although interestingly you end each stanza with 'Calgary Weir' so you have essentially used one rhyme for half the poem. The meter suits the form. presentation is good and the progression of thought is smooth and clear. The poem flows, by and large, but the meter is uneven in places. You have employed some nice phrases as well with "missing sphere" being my favourite. My main criticism is that you use the format "did + verb" to avoid using past tense. This is evidently done to maintain rhymes. While such a thing might be acceptable once in a while, I see it overdone in this poem and it certainly detracts from the impact. Well written structured verse always sounds natural, even if it has been meticulously crafted. The use of devices such as "did + verb" or too many inversions make the work sound artificial and therefore less effective. You could alter the lines slightly and yet maintain the rhymes. For instance, instead of "Away I ran, yes I did dash", you could say something like "Away I ran: a frantic dash". Simple poems can sometimes be rather difficult at times. This seems to be one of those. But with a few modifications I think it will read much better. Keep writing!

This review was written for a previous version of this writing

Posted 9 Years Ago


4 of 4 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

I will go through and do away with most of the 'do verbs' and their many forms! I tend to overuse t.. read more
Augustus

9 Years Ago

You're most welcome Lawrence! I have been writing primarily structured verse since I was 11 and I've.. read more
LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

If, when you get a chance, you would give this poem another look and see if I took adequate care of .. read more



Reviews

Wow this had me captivated from the first word to the last. The story it tells is interesting and the rhythm is soothing. The word choice is brilliant as well!

Posted 6 Years Ago


LawrenceRaybon

6 Years Ago

Thanks, I'm glad you liked it!
I love this ballad. The title is a perfect combination of sounds. It demands to be spoken aloud. I really enjoyed the rhythm of the piece as well. The major issue I have that could be fixed is the use of 'Calgary Weir' to end so many lines. I understand why they end each stanza but there are so many stanzas that it starts to feel tedious. That starts to take away some of the power of the poem. One suggestion, take or leave it, is to change the ending of a few of those stanzas to something else. Think of it like a chorus to a song. You have the reader hooked then hit them with something unexpected that reinforces the message/central theme of the poem. Maybe do it in the fourth and eighth stanza. Just a thought.

Like I said, I love this piece but it could still be improved in my opinion. As it stands now, I give it something in the low nineties. I am a tough grader as I think honesty is the best thing you can give a writer. Consider this a great grade.

Courtesy of the Constructive Critics

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

Loved it. I loved the tones and the words. Nice

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thank you!
Advertise Here
Want to advertise here? Get started for as little as $5
I really enjoyed this poem. You are such a harder worker and a wonderful writer. Thank you for helping me so much. I really appreciate all your group does.

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thank you and you're welcome!
I like it. It was powerful. Well done! :)

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thanks for the review, I'm glad you liked it!
Konigin

9 Years Ago

:) You are welcome!
an interesting dark tale within this ballad ....nice vivid details painting the scene ` well done I say!!

This review was written for a previous version of this writing

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thanks for the review! I'm glad you liked it!
This is clearly a ballad, a story poem as you call it. It is written in couplets of iambic tetrameter, although interestingly you end each stanza with 'Calgary Weir' so you have essentially used one rhyme for half the poem. The meter suits the form. presentation is good and the progression of thought is smooth and clear. The poem flows, by and large, but the meter is uneven in places. You have employed some nice phrases as well with "missing sphere" being my favourite. My main criticism is that you use the format "did + verb" to avoid using past tense. This is evidently done to maintain rhymes. While such a thing might be acceptable once in a while, I see it overdone in this poem and it certainly detracts from the impact. Well written structured verse always sounds natural, even if it has been meticulously crafted. The use of devices such as "did + verb" or too many inversions make the work sound artificial and therefore less effective. You could alter the lines slightly and yet maintain the rhymes. For instance, instead of "Away I ran, yes I did dash", you could say something like "Away I ran: a frantic dash". Simple poems can sometimes be rather difficult at times. This seems to be one of those. But with a few modifications I think it will read much better. Keep writing!

This review was written for a previous version of this writing

Posted 9 Years Ago


4 of 4 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

I will go through and do away with most of the 'do verbs' and their many forms! I tend to overuse t.. read more
Augustus

9 Years Ago

You're most welcome Lawrence! I have been writing primarily structured verse since I was 11 and I've.. read more
LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

If, when you get a chance, you would give this poem another look and see if I took adequate care of .. read more
Very nice voice as well as rhythm and rhyme...the speaker sounds like a young boy spying the horrible events of a battle from the civil War era. So nice work there. There are a few bumps along the way however, with wc as in the line ...rodents start to bustle...not sure "bustle" works for me. Also, you should try to match the tenses..is and was. I'd stay in present tense. Overall excellent work here.
Susan

This review was written for a previous version of this writing

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thanks for the review! I'll go through and fix the tense issues as best I can.

I did.. read more
Susan C. Allen

9 Years Ago

oh sorry, wc means word choice...and bumps means it didn't always flow for me. when I read poetry i.. read more
LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thanks! I have very little formal training in creative writing and poetry so I'm still catching up .. read more
Interesting poem here, I went to read it as the title caught my eye. I live in Calgary, and there is a weir on the Bow River, it has lead to the drowning of many a rafter over the years. At great cost a few years ago, this area was converted to white water rafting. The floods last year destroyed that.
So, other than rhyming, what prompted the words "Calgary Weir", I am curious, as no incidents as described ever happened there.
Noel

This review was written for a previous version of this writing

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

I had no idea that Calgary Weir was a real place! I just liked the way the name rolled off the tong.. read more
Woo, spooky! I think this is pretty cool, a play on the idea of a ballad. For the most part, you stick to the rhythm and rhyme scheme, but there are a few lines that feel like they might have an extra strong or weak syllable in them -- read it out loud! The imagery is very nice, I like the spookiness. However, on a technical note, you begin in implied past tense, then write in present tense, then revert to past tense -- I prefer to avoid whiplash when reading poetry -- just make sure all of your verbs agree with the tense you have chosen.

This review was written for a previous version of this writing

Posted 9 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.

LawrenceRaybon

9 Years Ago

Thanks for the feedback!
I'll work on the tense issues.
I'll have to give it a few days .. read more
DaughterNature

9 Years Ago

Lolz, I can definitely sympathize! Sometimes you just need to let a piece sit in a drawer for a few .. read more

Share This
Email
Facebook
Twitter
Request Read Request
Add to Library My Library
Subscribe Subscribe


Stats

531 Views
10 Reviews
Rating
Added on May 6, 2014
Last Updated on May 9, 2014

Author

LawrenceRaybon
LawrenceRaybon

Jackson, MS



About
Hi! I'm an avid reader who loves to write. I also love helping others who are serious about improving their writing! My critiques are in-depth and honest, no ego stroking and I expect the same wh.. more..

Writing

Related Writing

People who liked this story also liked..