I wrote this piece some time ago after having far too many conversations with U.S. citizens about separation of Church and State and the role religion should play in the public sphere. Every single one of them pointed to the motto of the United States as an excuse for the meddling of religion in politics, and for many to call for a greater union - verging on theocracy. What none of them knew however is that the motto of the United States wasn't always 'In God We Trust' in point of fact it only became that in 1956. The original motto was 'E Pluribus Unum' - 'Out of many, One' adopted in 1782 along with 'Annuit Coeptis' and 'Novus Ordo Seclorum.'
To be frank I was astounded how poorly informed of their own history these people were, and they were university students unnervingly.
A.E.
My Review
Would you like to review this Poem? Login | Register
It is always shaming to be grouped in with my countrymen in these regards. The fact is that American splendor has removed the need for proper knowledge on our own history. It's not as if we have had millennia to take into account. To most Americans, our nation began with the Declaration of Independence. To the rest, it begins when the first man to walk its fields did so.
I believe that the current motto probably came into place as a response to "godless communism", as our leaders were so fond of terming it.
And yet, I feel I must say this. America was formed by the wealthy, Christian landowners and has continued to be run by them. However, their quality has oh so degraded to the point of believing not in the "one for all" but the "all for one."
What does 'Annuit Coeptis" and 'Novus Ordo Seclorum' mean?
Many speak about which they know nothing. You are correct about U.S citizens knowing little about their history. Instead of criticizing, we all need to bring each other up to the other's knowledge if they are more in tuned or well versed on a subject. I think we should learn something each day, and from every experience and every person we encounter.
An abundance of meaning in only two verses.
Whatever was in the past could never be taken to the present or future. Change would always interfere along the way, constantly modifying a practice until it would become exactly different, worst if, it'd become the opposite. If this were not true for all, perhaps for most.
Thanks so much for this short but poignant poem about the 'Now' generation who are brash, impatient, too ambitious, irresponsible, highly competitive, selfish, immature with 'attitude' and many others to say the least. So different from the older generations of idealism, selflessness, responsibility, humility, sporting nature, brotherly love, patience and so on and so forth. So much said in just a few lines. Very well thought out.
A noble man compares and estimates himself by an idea which is higher than himself; and a mean man, by one lower than himself. The one produces aspiration; the other ambition, which is the way in whic.. more..