2: Inherently Something

I cannot find, I cannot be

more than this, more than thee.

You are so much more than man

and I am that which is 'sovereignty',

ruled by that of a collective kind:

underlying 3-piece argument of mind,

the ethics, the logic, and that other one

yet as empathetic as a stone.

You are you, and cannot be

the true inheritance of humanity.

I am right and so is he;

his is mankind, and is kind to me.

Reviews

[Cruz Niq]

"I am right and so is he;
his is mankind, and is kind to me"
Love this line.
I like this poem, I've reread it a couple times. I'll probably be way off the mark with my interpretation.
This poem speaks of two things, individualism and "humanity". Humanity is society, society is conformed. Society is what we, as humans favor it to be. We favor what we know, which is society. Society = mankind, and you can not be mankind if you are considered an individual without favor.

[BAlanMorgan]

I love that interpretation. It truly delights me that you would re read this, let alone read it in the first place, and I feel that "art is in the eye of the beholder"--so if that's your interpretation, then that is your interpretation. I wrote this intending for mankind to be inherently good, (the question of whether man is made in sin or born in sin or in goodness) and that there are so many ways anyone can interpret this, however, so if that's what you take from my poem, then that's wonderful :) I originally wrote this speaking to God, as if he was asking me the question of man is good or bad, and I decided that mankind is good, however it takes my thought, my ethics, and my feelings (ethos pathos logos) (individualism) to see that--I am sovereignty, not conformity. You're right to interpret this the way you did :)

[Cruz Niq]

You know what, I considered that! Because of the "you are so much more than man" line. Almost as if the speaker were scrutinizing God.

[BAlanMorgan]

Yes EXACTLY :D that's exactly what the tone of that line was meant to be
:)