5 Vital Tips to Write a Good Literature ReviewA Story by Pamela RosserIf you are proposing a research topic that already has a significant number of previously published works, the prospect of creating a good literature review may seem like a daunting task: so many books and articles with so many references! A literature review has a specific functionYou may be tempted to save time by limiting your review to the last decade, but this can be a critical point for failure. The goal of writing a literature review is to earn credibility in your research. Without trusted resources, your research results are rejected as nothing more than your personal opinion, based on some basic methodologies. A poorly performed review of scientific literature can ruin research work in four stages:
How to review the literatureTo write a good review of the scientific literature, you must start with a clear understanding of the role that it plays in carrying out a substantial part of the scientific research:
Demonstrate Material ProficiencyThis is not about maximizing the number of peer-reviewed materials, and the goal should not be to read “everything” on the proposed topic: for some topics, this will be physically impossible. Focus on the appropriateness of the material for your proposed topic and outline the logical basis for the analysis of this material. Develop connections that make sense in this framework and organize your review around ideas, not dubious links, of the researcher, subject, or chronology. Never try to pretendInclude only those materials that you actually read, since copying and pasting someone else’s bibliography can turn out badly afterward, especially if you need oral defense, and someone asks about your thoughts about a specific article or study. Remember, just reading a dissertation or a conference document is not enough - you must criticize it: what worked and what didn’t, and what would you do differently? The most important thing is the meaningYour reader should get to the end of your literature review with a sense of full understanding of how your proposed study is consistent with the current volume of published work. If your reader cannot understand what you are doing with regard to what came before you, your literature review has failed both as an independent part of the academic work and as a building block for your general learning. © 2020 Pamela RosserAuthor's Note
Reviews
|
Stats
307 Views
1 Review Added on March 26, 2020 Last Updated on March 26, 2020 Author
|