calling all breeders

when facing the loss

of the ability

the majority

mourn the death of

dream

fulfillment

while i

 

the symbol

but not essence

of my

+

 

          where attachment meets definition to/of physicality

          the discussion focuses on the exclusivity of the ability

          contradictory physicality suggesting correlative mental distinctions

          dominance determined by exclusivity

          production is universal

          replenishing an exclusory sub set

          subject to the process of the intellect 

 

 

the physical

not subsidiary

nor subordinate

but sub set  

 

its loss does not destroy

the purpose

the whole

 

        

 

Reviews

[Eshe' Allen]

sorry about that, i do tend to get obscure. i'm talking largely about production, more specifically of child bearing. the idea that my "+" (taken from the female symbol) is not based solely on my ability to produce physically but also on my ability to produce mentally. the existence of inherent differences in male/female physicality dictate that there must also be correlative differences in mentality. therefore, both acts are inherently female so the loss of the physical ability does not destroy my ability to "produce" as a female. i was also attempting to explore exactly what "+" means. or at least frame the discussion. finally, in deciding which ability, physical or mental, is superior in this equation we have to consider the fact that the physical does not occur without the mental. therefore, as mental controls the physical, it is dominant, making the loss of the physical significant but not fatal to "womanhood."

[Robert Francis Callaci]

You got to be a philosophy student:) I totally got a kick out of this- didn't know what the hell it meant but I saw humor dancing along each line. You got a quirky and razor sharp mind...


my warmest
bob