Three Edge {Apple}

Media-market issues/ethics drive this fictionalized 'culture-portrait' of the 'incendiary' debate(s) and populous-chat(s) surrounding parental controls for empire.

A tale of capitalism excess meditation(s) and free-speech/capitalism controls arguments, inspired by the excellent 'chess' minded graphic-media market themed American film The People vs. Larry Flynt (Milos Forman). Thanks so much for reading, 

----

====

Three special figures/characters in the modern media-world, two movie stars and a cyber-blogger, were discussing the quality of youth-entertainment relevant for adult-world ideations and the 'chess' of education-IQ oriented Western/American playspace ethics/ethos in the social-media environment of magazine/fanzine-driven exposition(s).

CELEBRITY 1: There's a fancy for military-machinery/vehicles in toy-markets for youth 'chess' journals.
BLOGGER: The Cold-War offered social-media in chess-stalemate 'dioramas' (Fischer-Spassky education).
CELEBRITY 2: Qualities in youth-toys/fancy for playspace-capitalism represents Earth-IQ for good storytellers.

A fanatical homegrown American terrorist (Richard Jem) decided to counter/oppose the activity of these three media 'characters' by creating pirate-net posts about sci-fi/horror media/video-games of highly-graphic quality to espouse the contradictory notion(s) of violence-anarchy driven youth-accessible entertainment for pure fear(s). However, the media-trio banded together (in defense!) and argued for the normative new-age value of parental-controls in the market of such 'graphic' media to present more cogent ideas about 'social controls' in the argumentations of 'deviance'-excess media appeal and accessibility! It became an honestly ethics-chess oriented 'fashion' debate for free-speech/free-market capitalism, despite the fact that Jem was sort of an incendiary-elf/dangerous!

RICHARD JEM: What I want more than anything in this capitalism-drenched universe is 'wrought' privacy for pure excess!

Despite the (certain) fact that Jem wasn't going to win 'brownie-points' with any social leaders or Congressmen, he raised strangely appealing chat(s) for the populous/masses regarding the Internet's 'unfiltered' qualities of graphic-media and the 'natural' human (albeit controversial!) interest(s) in non-ethics based capitalism. The three media-figures continued to argue that presenting American capitalism liberalness as a 'market' for no-ethics control(s) would only add fuel to the fires of argumentation that America simply didn't have the necessary education-chess to erect youth-wise forms of media/entertainment supervision that would 'clearly' separate the Western world from radical/fundamental terrorists who simply opened the Hellmouth of anarchy for the post-9/11 age. Would this strange parallax of 'chess' in media enhance the dialogue surrounding the 'need' for open dialogue surrounding/regarding the 'quality' of capitalism itself, or was Jem simply a fanatical Devil's Advocate? Perhaps it would be students of the West (Harvard/Dartmouth/UCLA) who'd ultimately deliver this symbolic 'excess-stalemate' verdict (for all consumers!).

====

"Money is everything" (Ecclesiastes)