The Big Bang

The Big Bang

A Poem by Gomer LePoet
"

a trick poem in it's strucure about the evolution of the Universe

"
 

The Big Bang


The cosmological model of the beginning of time,

best guestimate is 14 billion years, less a dime,

expanding universe growing and stretching,

are ideas and concepts I find quite fetching


Lemaitre's hypothesis of the primeval atom,

relying on general relativity and isotropy of space,

super scientific babblings of things I know not,

if Einstein was here now, I'd put him on the spot


explanations of this though not withstanding,

does it really matter, how the matter was left standing,

be it only 15 minutes past, or one-hundred trillion,

how it was created really has no bearing does it now


I think a more relevant question would consider,

is this the first time, that this event has occurred,

although our view of this event was obscured,

is there any chance at all, this could be repeated


now this brings to question, if it can happen again,

has this mystical magical event ever preceded,

if this has you baffled, has you scratching your chin,

now here is a theory that should receive consideration


one has to wonder where was this enormity hiding,

prior to its expansion, just how did it fit into nothingness,

on the backs of millions of oxen, just gently gliding,

planets, suns, moons, stars, galaxies glowing in the dark


now there resides a puzzle, inside of this story,

it's technical explanation, I really do not know,

but the secrets are in the lines, of the verses just read,

if you understand this rhyming trick, please let me know.


Gomer LePoet

© 2010 Gomer LePoet


My Review

Would you like to review this Poem?
Login | Register




Reviews

hahahha I like this a lot... Scientists are indoctrinating us not less than the religions do. Science is religion! And when they have gaps in their equations, they offer something like "dark energy", or "dark matter", why don't they say just Micky Mouse? I mean, even a child could offer such an answer, what I don't see, is dark. This is utterly respectless towards humanity, to say, universe is so and so big. How can they say so? Why don't they say, "what we can see", universe is so and so big? This is charlatanery, this nonsense, another nonsense: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-1268712/Stephen-Hawking-Aliens-living-massive-ships-invade-Earth.html This man said in London in year 2003, he has to apologize, because he was wrong for 30 years, and he had to withdraw his theory. This man seems to be insane, and I think, one has to say it loud. When I would be running around saying, "I believe the aliens are going to attack us", they will lock me up! Science explains complex things in terms of the interactions of simpler things, ultimately the interactions of fundamental particles but they still didn't find the Higg's particle! beautifully simple idea that all things are made of fundamental particles which, although exceedingly numerous, are drawn from a small, finite set of types of particle; but nobody can make the whole of tiny bits here and bits there, then they have holes in their equations and call it dark matter; this is utterly wrong assumption, we all bear the information of absolutely everything in us, the ancient information of our ancestors; the information of earth and the universe. How does moon know what he has to do to earth? And how does sun know earth needs its shining? And how does the the one-cell organism know, how to communicate with another one-cell organism placed in another tube? Well, we humans still can't communicate through light! And how does the plant know, how to survive, how does the bacteria in the ocean, 12 km under the surface know how to survive without light and anything, in my books this is extremely intelligent to wait till there is the right environment and slumber till then.. . If we are skeptical, it is likely to be because we think the idea to know is too simple... I like your hiding and gliding trick. Well, where it was hiding? it didn't exist. There was no space and no time when there was nothing. Why not to say, everything existed always? Why the dualistic approach.. This was witty, erudite and very accessible polemic. I loved it.



Posted 14 Years Ago


1 of 2 people found this review constructive.

Awesome write here.
I liked this one has an amazing flow to it
I liked the rhyme scheme as well.
I assume these are lyrics.
I like it

Posted 14 Years Ago


1 of 1 people found this review constructive.


Share This
Email
Facebook
Twitter
Request Read Request
Add to Library My Library
Subscribe Subscribe


Stats

119 Views
2 Reviews
Rating
Added on April 26, 2010
Last Updated on May 25, 2010

Author

Gomer LePoet
Gomer LePoet

Tampa, FL



About
I am a former IT Manager/Consultant working for many Fortune 500 companies, mainly in the Banking, Telecommunications industry. I am also a part time musician, playing guitars and keyboards and writ.. more..

Writing