Understanding Comparative Negligence in Car Accident ClaimsA Story by will SmithA car accident attorney in Las Vegas gave us a comprehensive view of the concept and meaning of the term Comparative Negligence. This article expresses his professional knowledge in a simple way to unA gave us a comprehensive view of the concept and meaning of the term Comparative Negligence. This article expresses his professional knowledge in a simple way to understand it. Car accidents are common occurrences on our roads, and they can result in severe injuries, property damage, and even death. If you have been involved in a car accident caused by another person's negligence, you may be entitled to compensation for your damages. However, what happens when you and the other driver are at fault for the accident? This is where the concept of comparative negligence comes into play. Comparative negligence
is a legal concept used to determine the degree of fault for each party
involved in an accident. In a car accident claim, comparative negligence comes
into play when the plaintiff and the defendant are found to have contributed to
the accident. In this scenario, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by the
percentage of their fault. Knowing the basics of
negligence in a car accident claim is essential to understand comparative
negligence. Negligence is the failure to exercise reasonable care that harms
others. In a car accident claim, the plaintiff must prove the following four
elements of negligence:
When both parties are
found to have contributed to the accident, the court will use the concept of
comparative negligence to apportion the fault between the plaintiff and the
defendant. The court will look at the evidence presented and assign a
percentage of fault to each party. For example, if the plaintiff were found to
be 30% at fault for the accident, their damages would be reduced by 30%. There are two types of
comparative negligence: pure comparative negligence and modified comparative
negligence. Let's take a closer look at each type. Pure
Comparative Negligence In states that use pure
comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are reduced by their percentage
of fault, regardless of how much fault the defendant bears. For example, if the
plaintiff is found to be 50% at fault for the accident, their damages will be
reduced by 50%, even if the defendant is found to be 50% at fault. Pure
comparative negligence is used in California, Florida, and New York. Pure comparative
negligence differs from other comparative negligence in that the plaintiff's
liability is lowered by their share of fault, regardless of how much fault the
defendant carries. In contrast, different types of comparative negligence may
set a threshold for the plaintiff's percentage of the defect before damages are
reduced or may bar the plaintiff from recovering any damages if their percentage
of fault is too high. A court or jury
determines fault by reviewing the evidence and assigning a percentage of fault
to each party involved in the accident. If you are in a car
accident in a state that uses pure comparative negligence, you should gather as
much evidence as possible to support your claim. Witness statements, police
reports, and medical records may be included. You should also speak with an
experienced car accident lawyer who can help you understand your state's laws
and fight for the compensation you deserve. Modified
Comparative Negligence In states that use
modified comparative negligence, the plaintiff's damages are reduced if their
percentage of the fault falls below a threshold of 50% or 51%. If the plaintiff
is found to be more than 50% or 51%, they are barred from recovering damages.
Modified comparative negligence is used in Texas, Pennsylvania, and Georgia. It is important to note
that not all states use comparative negligence. Some states use contributory
negligence, which bars the plaintiff from recovering any damages if they are
found to have contributed to the accident in any way. Contributory negligence
is used in Virginia, Maryland, and Alabama. The concept of
comparative negligence can be complex, and it is important to consult with an
experienced car accident attorney if you are involved in an accident. Your
attorney can help you understand the laws in your state and how they apply to
your case. In a comparative
negligence case, gathering as much evidence as possible to prove your case is
crucial. This evidence may include witness statements, police reports, medical
records, and any other documentation related to the accident. Your attorney can
help you gather and present this evidence in court to support your claim. If you are found to be
partially at fault for the accident, it is important, to be honest about your
role in the accident. Trying to hide or minimize your role can harm your case
and make it more difficult to recover damages. Instead, be upfront about your
actions and work with your attorney to present a strong case. Another important
consideration in a comparative negligence case is the role of insurance. In
some states, insurance companies must follow relative negligence laws and pay
damages based on the percentage of fault assigned to each party. However, in
some states, insurance companies may try to minimize their payout by arguing
the plaintiff was partially at fault for the accident. This is why an
experienced attorney can negotiate with the insurance company and fight for
your deserved compensation. In conclusion,
comparative negligence is an essential concept in car accident claims. When
both parties are found to have contributed to the accident, the court will use
comparative negligence to determine the degree of fault for each party and
reduce the plaintiff's damages accordingly. It is essential to understand the
laws in your state and work with an experienced attorney to gather evidence and
present a strong case. Doing so can maximize your chances of recovering the
compensation you need to cover your damages and move forward after a car
accident. © 2023 will Smith |
Stats |