Scientific Methods And LogicA Story by Talal AbbasiOn 28th of March 1728, a coffin was carry in to the Westminster abbey, in it there was a body of man who already held high office, although he wasn’t a politician.“Mind
prioritize depth over breath”
n 28th
of March 1728, a coffin was carry in to the Westminster abbey, in it there was
a body of man who already held high office, although he wasn’t a politician. He
although managed to hanged a person, although he wasn’t a member of judiciary.
His coffin was carry out by the famous Lord Chancellor, two dukes and three
arils even he wasn’t a priest. Still reading this paragraph you can’t recognize
who was that man actually. That man was Isaac Newton. I admire even the people who are buried in Westminster
abbey. I read that all noble kings, royals, influential and even today’s
politician just ended their life in the most fascinating royal place. That
place actually wasn’t reserved for any common guys like newton in fact. But
newton wasn’t an ordinary man. Even if someone is interested to go down to wish
a good luck in peace on newton’s grave yard, one will soon observed these words
in front of his stone “Hic depositum est, quod mortale fuit Isaaci
Newtoni”.
These Latin words translated as ‘Here lies that which was mortal of Isaac
Newton’. Newton is described as first philosopher of science, and
that’s the way we honor him but certainly he wasn’t the last one. In
Westminster abbey’s church, right in front of statue of newton, one can finds
the floor names like ‘Michel faraday’ or ‘Paul Dereck’. The floor itself inscribe
the equation and behavior of an atom to the honor of Westminster abbey. It’s perhaps no coincidence that all the great nations, honors
there leading scientists in this way. In all our history of mankind, men and
women who explained the true spirit of nature from decoding of DNA to the vast
universe of atoms. These people provide us the physics that a modern science
could ever conceive and transformed the communication with World Wide Web. This
article will describe how modern science took his birth from the first spark of
first mankind. It will also introduced all those people who contributed their
whole life, just to define the contemporary character of science development.
Explorations from the vast ocean depth to the discoveries of unknown skies of
universe. In terms of saying civilized society, how does science played his
part to make humankind much intelligent in learning behavior and social
interactive of modern technological development. From any scientific
achievement and discoveries history, mankind learned and perceived true meaning
of genuine inspirations and rising innovation girds. I always, concealed a
strange prospect on the birth of science. Scientists throughout history,
believed in an idea, they developed theories to argue for centuries in their
researches, they experiment these theories in practical formulations, they
understand and explained the behavioral science of theoretical equation and at
last they were to be curious having achieving the answer for their ‘conclusion
of an idea’. In every book of science it is known as ‘Scientific Method’. Its
characteristic are the bedrock for the modern science. What is the important
part of this discussion that reveals us, a similarity of all great scientists
from East to West, used ‘Scientific Methods’ to embraced their achievement as
well as their affection for discovering true nature of life. All my years of studying basic science in school, modern
scientific calculation at college level, engineering at university level and
even still, I believe that all roots of modern science achievement stops at
Albert Einstein. A lot of people ignore my believe due to their own
contradictory opinion about science, but whatever I discovered about science
can be pronounce in one word ‘Amazing’. Coming back to interesting point
of Newton’s life; that even his own mother wasn’t expecting his child to
survive even 15 weeks later. He wrote all those bad deeds which he would always
regret in his life from the age of 19, including ‘Threatening his father and
mother’. He never had the opportunity to live with his family, at the age of
three he was sent to live with his grand-mother. Isaac Newton never believed in
world-based logics rather than following the guidance of God. In some
historical events, Newton proclaimed that God has chosen him to interpret the
Bible. He proposed that world would end no sooner than 2060’. During his time
as member of British parliament, he only spoke once, just to ask someone to
close the window. He owned more books of history rather than on science. He
studied actually for law degree rather than for science. Newton was notorious for his bad temper and conflicts
with other people. During his happy life, most people had heard newton saying ‘"If I have seen further it is by standing on the
shoulders of giants." In
short newton had obsessions, was malicious and prone out-raged. During my research for writing this article, I never went
through newton’s science rather than his began of science. Because there was
something quite extraordinary about the way he worked. I would explain his
beginning, from tiny little concept; in an age, when people still believed in
magic and magician would performed their little tricks in European eras; Newton
derived pure mathematical framework with which investigate the real nature of
world. Newton was born in a country where different transitions were taking
part in society; armies were fighting wars and people were hunting for witches
but in fact that was a pure pre-planned time of history where people weren’t
focusing on the rational reasons or logics of practical instruments. Even at that interval, fire was common mechanism but folks
were more curious about the nature of light. Everyone already knew by then
about prison splitting of colours of light, but the important question was how
and why? This all process started from Islamic Scholars to the ancient Greek
theorists. How come a light is coming from the thousand miles of sky, in
straight path so perfectly? Newton before presenting his answer for this
question, he observed that light consist of diverse colours but supposing a
barrier (Slate) between the prism and the wall, which would results the
separation of colours and appearance of particular Colour and second prism
behind slate would diverge the particular Colour onto the wall; He studied the
deflection of light to test his hypothesis. Observations were simple and
logical, when Slate would have green Colour, the second prison would show green
light on to the wall. And so it applies with every changing Colour. Newton’s
observation about Nature of light was simple enough; that light is combination
of pure different colours. It means colours themselves are the basic building
of light. That was genius approach in terms of common sense. Newton was merely the first person who interrogated the
nature, using the principles; now what we call them as ‘Scientific Methods’. In other words He observed the world, came up
with countless theories, explained what he discern then he tested experiments
whether he was precise. The power of this approach is to remove pre-conceive
ideas and in doing so delivery’s more accurate description of natural world.
But all clarity of his thoughts and techniques, newton himself unaware of
significant of his work. During my research through internet, I came up with some
strange newton’s one of the master written manuscript. It is the book, where
first time ‘Law of gravitation’ was
written by own hands of Newton. Every person doing undergraduate most have to
learn that law in fact before graduating. That manuscript not only give us the
importance of those law but also witness about newton’s great art of mind.
Newton’s manuscript also tell us that how he was enquiring about sharing ideas
and knowledge by writing it and proclaiming those ideas in to the minds of
pre-occupied minds of people. Newton was not good enough. He was man of contradictions,
giving where he lived in the middle of 17th century. He understood
the cost of reason so he was a man undoubtedly feet in both world mystical and
scientific. My point can be proved through one reason, he was astrologist,
physicist, and mathematician even alchemy as well. He was a man who understood
himself as a visionary. He says “the nature of
things can naturally and securely, deduced by their rope ration one upon other
rather than upon senses”. By which he meant how nature works only a way
and how it appears; by understanding the logic and reason of its occurrence, to
explain what one’s has observed. It seems clashing to me that ‘Scientific Method’ took long postponement to reveal, after all
Newton just lived on earth few hundred years ago. Heart of problem; world is
complicated and always remain in motion but newton himself shown us the way
that ‘it is easier to understand if one simplify the world’s complicated
structures’. It is possible to deduce the nature of light to get rainbow. It a
systematic logic in the history of science which shed light on the true laws of
nature, construction of matter to orbits of planets. It already improves our
life through its applications and technological development. Even after 250
years after Isaac Newton discovery of ‘Scientific
Methods’ we came to from our darkest period of age to the most civilized
fashion of life. Even in my previous article ‘Birth of Divisive Science
and Frankenstein Notion’, I wrote how science came in the
middle of both World Wars. In 1940s conveys of supplies and food bringing from
United States to Britain, were facing harsh situation from German U-boats, even
Churchill observed that they might lose the war. At that period salvation; came
not in the form of new weapon system or aircrafts but from the hands of few
dedicated people even I would say genius who had some papers and little
dedication. Even still reader doesn’t understands my sentences and my finger
point. During the world war 1st, cryptography came into exist by
some most talented people of Britain. All of intercepted German’s codes on
radio were brought for analysis where they were decrypted on daily basis. Even
still today, I am much curious about art of cryptography which is also a part
of science. It’s a solving of cross-road and playing like a chess on the board.
People who were working as cryptographers were enjoying the breaking the codes,
even they doesn’t care about the impact of war which was fought on the front
line with bombs dropping and sound of gun fires. The Importance of cryptography
came from a very simple idea. Despite of man-power; tanks, ships, aircrafts
were coordinated by only one mean of medium which still doesn’t replace. Yes!
Radio, which played an essential part in any art of war. Radio communication
was the only way of contact between German Nazi’s high command and the forces
fighting on the front lines. Scientists during those war time, doesn’t have the
time to spend on newton law of theories or find the reason of why apple falls down.
But in anyway, they propose the introduction of cryptology. Even Da Vinci had
been the mysterious inventor of codes but with the same concept of ‘Scientific Methods’ scientists
developed advance technique of decrypting of German radio interceptions. And
with same decrypted communication, Allied forces could anticipate the next
movement of German Forces. Most of the general traffic were decoded by a machine known
as ‘enigma’, used by allied forces.
Alan Turing, British mathematician, logician, cryptanalyst, computer scientist
and philosopher developed this cipher machine. It was used for almost every
radio code breaking during war time by allied forces. But after the meantime,
Germans found out about enigma’s
mechanism of code breaking so Germans change the code patterns. During few
researches in cryptology, I found out that there was another machine which was
developed for high-level code breaking coming from berlin; after enigma’s leak.
It also uses same principles like enigma,
but it was far more complicated. Berlin decoding pattern of ‘enigma’ was known as ‘Lorenzo Cipher’ by German Nazi. It was
capable of sending out a secret message in 1.6 million billion ways (1,600,000,000,000,000).
The Allied forces called it ‘Turing’.
According to Captain Reginald, who worked at intercepting German communication
during World War II; there were three levels of code breaking used by Britain
against German Nazi. It might not have been conceivable without a man for ‘Scientific Approach’; named as ‘Bill
Tutte’ who reduced the complex into simple equation. Despite of being
mathematician, he spent 3 months during war times, in cracking the codes. I
suppose, it’s a big deal for a common mind to imagine an extra-ordinary work
achievement done by these sort of people. But fortunately I think, it’s just a
simple common sense based on meek logics what we call now ‘Scientific Approach’. In the history of covert World War History, German Nazi
High Command transmitted same Turing based pattern coded signal; later on it
was intercepted by allied forces. It was a point for Bill, to crack-in the code
pattern of entire encrypted system. His approach was scientific because he
observed that messages were similar, not identical and they used same key for
encrypting it. He knew that there must be repeated patterns, and what if he
could find those patterns with careful observation then it might be possible to
crack the code using general formulation. Off course “Nothing is impossible”,
Bill Tutte” eventually did find the decryption pattern. Decryption pattern was
hidden in a prime number “41”. His hypothesis suggested that this number be
set-up as possible to first tunny’s scrambling wheels. And this hypothesis
resulted correct in almost every decryption of messages. The Nazis must have
been highly confident that Lorenzo could not be broken and were probably right
to believe this what with its massive encryption abilities. One of Tutte’s
contemporaries at Bletchley Park in Britain, Jerry Roberts, said that Tutte was
one of “the forgotten heroes” of World War
II. Roberts later said: “I used to wonder if he
was doing anything. My word, he was. (Breaking Tunny) was a most extraordinary
achievement.” Bletchley Park; Allied secret code breaking site during
WWII; decoded messages sent by the most senior of the Wehrmacht’s officers "
Keitel " and even messages sent by Hitler himself, such was his faith in his
“secrets writer”. I think Bill Tutte, never known how cipher actually worked
in encoding German codes. But by using basic binary logics with careful
observation on patterns, this motivated him to build a machine based on same
German code encryption logics but with opposite pattern of decryption. His
machine automatically decode messages in Bletchley Park, as German High Command
in berlin transmits the code signals. Bill’s ‘Scientific Approach’ enabled allied to listen every words of
German Interception with their deception message. Coming back to Bill, He never
imagined himself to be the inventor of ‘Tunny Cipher’, but he loved in problem
solving’s and puzzles from his early life. This approach is similar with
approaches of Newton, Faraday, Darwin and Einstein. It’s just a simple concept
of “how things work”? Contemporary, there is another man “Richard Borcherds”, who
is mathematician specializing in lattices, number theory, group theory, and
infinite-dimensional algebras. He is a professor of mathematics at University
of California at Berkley. During my research, I found out that he is on his
quest of breaking almost uncrack able code. He thinks “About matter, not how
they work but how they exists”. From past two years he is trying to solve the
problem which lies in the heart of quantum theories. Many of previous
scientists already back out from the Quantum Theory headache, but still ‘Richard’
doesn’t give up. I already talked about ‘Scientific Approach’ a lot but what
I read about Richard’s approach is quite the opposite. He describes himself “Watching me working and thinking is quite same like
watching me sleeping”. He appeared like doing meditation. He didn’t give
up at any point, even spending a month working on an idea and still, it doesn’t
work. He highlighted simple concept that, “if we have
to do calculation, what calculation do we need to do? That the part of
mathematics which takes years and years, maybe centuries”. “Richard Borcherds” without a question has unusual mind,
and way of working, a mind similar to the code breakers, one capable of
dedicating years on the end results. It looks like almost uncomprehensive test
and understanding the abstract mathematics that underpins the universe.
Although his dedication appears to his extreme, but it’s just an element of
obsession which shares all scientists at one common believe. I believe through all these centuries from the beginning of
science itself discovered. It appears that science attracted all those people,
who shared “Scientific Approach”; from every single part of world (Not east or
west). Prof. Simon Baron-Cohen, who studies psychology of scientists; in his
book “Understanding Other Minds: Perspectives from
Social Cognitive Neuroscience” " 2013; mentioned that almost of the
scientists shared similar characteristic of human behavior and cognitive
nature. He says “Many people in the population;
are quite happy to flied from one topic to another. They are happy to chat
about something, but they don’t want to go around like for many hours”. “But with scientific Mind, although one does really
want to stay on one topic and work on it with deep under consideration.” Even I am quite positive and agree that it’s not wrong for
being working and thinking on same topic rather than scattering the mind in
different circle topics. Mind work on prioritizing depth over breath. I really
explained big reference with short phrase. But most of societies doesn’t really
believe in thinking about one thing, or even careful observation. They perceive
that one who thinks about one object all the time, become unaware of priority
or even himself, so it’s not better to be in lost. I never putted it up this
question to my audience directly but I asked them indirectly “What they really
want to think about all the time?” Most of the answer I observed were quite
specific to my above conclusion. As part of Simon’s research has shown another trail which
describe most common among scientists, “Attention to Detail”. Yeah its quite
right without any argument, that scientist do have more careful observation
analysis with little details as compare to a common person’s. We are
considering this a big different between psychological process between same
mental capability and diverse ‘detail observant’. One stage of hypothesis,
using questionnaire process of most common discussion, He developed a process
called “Systemizing process”. This questions list is a drive and ability for
one who can understand how things work. From weather to road maps; from
politics to car engines. List of question contain some even odd questions like
‘How you interesting in electric wiring in your house?’ For me it depend about
answer this sort of questions. Even there are a lot of people who demand ‘screw
toolkit’ on their birthday wishes from their parents during their juvenile. If some reader knows about ‘Autism’, during the time of
writing this article I did some research (Research Article - Autism); it’s a
character of describing a personality with respect of attention given to small
details. People with autism, does have the problem in interacting with social
but they do have more observative ability to the smallest niceties. They really
like to guise for the combinations, series and patterns just like a scientist.
These people do have different occupations or interest in different subjects
rather than science, but they often does experiments and their effects to
conclude their results. In most of the part of my research, a question was pop up
in my mind about ‘Whether all scientist consist of autism behavior?’ It’s
absolutely incorrect to say that ‘autism’ is character representation for the
scientist. We merely can compare or label autism with science. It’s just a word
describe the character of attention to the smallest detail by an individual.
According to ‘Prof. Simon Baron-Cohen’; it is evidently proved that “Unspecific
measures relevance, scientists are storing midway between people with autism
and rest of population”. Uncertainly, we really can’t find about characters
developed-in a scientists, or behavioral science and logics in an individual
mind; whether it’s careful observative skills, quick math’s, IQ level or even
creativity of an artist as well. Being a collective mind merely doesn’t help to
build a trail to conclude whether, “Scientific Approach” is a behavioral
Learning or not. In other words ‘Scientists doesn’t obligatory opens up electrical
toys to find how it works during his childhood’; it’s just the reason for
developing a theory to answer our question about ‘Scientific Approach’
specifically. Retrospectively, scientist’s allegiance to their subject
may sometimes appears quirky or acentric. Again I wasn’t satisfied my
conclusion and Henry Cavendish; chemist and physicist of 17th
Century came into my research during this article; He was described as Shy, absent-minded
and bad verbal communicator. Cavendish mostly worked on measure, weigh and
classify as many elements as he could. Like every scientist of across English
Channel, he was wealthy and he could invest on his experiment as he want and
the way he want. His experiments on electricity, were only published a century
after they were performed, when Maxwell rediscovered them in 1879. He really
discovered all the properties of hydrogen. Despite of having no idea during his
age, he continued his quest for to quantify hydrogen, until he could describe
every aspect of existence. He did want to know how this ‘Inflammable air’
(Hydrogen) reacts with other things, by experimenting hydrogen with air
(Oxygen) in combustion reaction in flask, where water bubbles appeared on the
inner side of glass flask. His only curiosity about world designed him to
perform experiment into possible way. Even he concluded wrong explanation for
this experiment, but he was correct with process of each stride. He never
accepted that water is consist of 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen atoms. His most of
theories were the assumptions on “alchemy ideas” rather than logics of modern
science. Even it was a non-sense ideas in his mind but he was a great
experimental scientist. His ideas about how nature works were completely wrong
but his results for measuring and quantifying the objects were marked correct. In first published scientific journal, Editor Henry
Oldenburg; who wrote “the purpose of scientific
journal allows scientists to impart knowledge to one another, and contribute
what they can to the grand design improving Natural knowledge and perfecting
all philosophical art and sciences”. When history talks about Oldenburg,
who provided a platform where for the first time scientists could widely share
their findings and new methods with others (Including people). He presented
notion for sharing the knowledge with others via organized written way. Going
through archives of journal, one could now easily finds every names of people
who really contributed their part of achievement in any of the national journal
throughout globe. History of science is different from political or art, reason
is simple; because science history is rest in peace for everyone to read and
understand the concept about natural phenomenon. Nearly 350 years later, after the publication of first
scientific journal printed, still scientific societies from all over the world
publishes the scientific philosophic journals. The purpose of scientific
journal represents the idea of sharing knowledge with others, rather than one
keeping to himself. If these historical journal weren’t written, John Tyndall
could never publishes the first piece of research about “Greenhouse effects” in
the Royal Society of Science Journal in 1861. John also explained how he got
the results during his research, so that anyone else reading his paper
(Scientific Journal); could modify his concepts in future or even recheck the
past results. With same rule of ‘Scientific Approach’; scientists always
rechecks and verifies the past results and accuracy for the betterments in
future. Even scientists who died 100 years ago, their results about theories or
performed experiments on different apparatus could be built in future and
verify one simple theory. I mention this process, so that one could easily
understands about science and their controversial part too. Scientific journals
from different region can easily testify the correct map of the discovery of
any element in past. One easily can ignore the double sighted concept and he
can understand the historical science, easily if he go-through Scientific
Journals. Scientific journals never proves or testify any opinions but results.
It represent the communication of one scientist with another one. It’s a forum
which tends to continue the debate. This is the main outcome of ‘How Modern
Science’ developed from time to time. Publishment is the best way of sharing
the results or work done by an individual like myself; writing an article. Since philosophical journal-entry emerged in 1665;
thousands of journal been published on every aspect of science. Scientific
journal were kept in different libraries around the world, so that they can be
trusted by the readers. The content inside a journal is always based on facts
rather than critic or opinion. This remarkable idea of publishing journal is a
great idea for keeping the history up-to-date. These Scientific Journals
torture very great minds and help us to separate good science from bad science.
In-results, scientists give their meaning to the latest research and publishes
them to current journal societies. Still
there are famous Scientific Journal who publishes their facts in different
shapes, Journal “Nature” is one of them; it’s one of the greatest Scientific
Journal of world according to Pew Review. These scientific journals are
reviewed according to their scientific content publishment every year. “No paper has any end”;
logically throughout history time, every new scientific journal has been
created based on the previous related journal-entry. Intellectuals throughout
world really test these journals and apply their common applications; from
Toyotas new technological feature in car to unmanned aircraft. Now even we call
globalization from common point, Scientific Journal already contributed his
part in our society to perceive and share the knowledge by any platform.
Nowadays if any new research would done, its authenticity would be the journal
publishment; so that people from different society could really test it and
even feel it (e.g. Global Warming, Nuclear hazards, Infection spreading…). Lately; Pew Review attempt to develop and introduce an
additional level of Riga, a process of discovery; allowing us to distinguish
between tested hypothesis and speculations. Some reader might have been
confused about Scientific Journal and A book. In a book, one can only finds the
opinion of author, it could be possibly assume that one could never going to
agree with content of author, or vice versa. Book always represents ‘statement
of an opinion’. Whereas scientific journal has level of checking through
different experts and other related scientific people; who could be sure of no
mistake or error in the content of “Scientific Journal”. In other words,
Scientific Journal represent the preeminent shot of how we look world by given
subject in reality. Talking about Newton’s rational approach to publishing
scientific journal, science never have any doubts in its subject comparing any
other field of art or history. In science, “an
experiment is an experiment” whether it’s newton’s deflection of light
or ‘LHC proton accelerating and collision experiment recently done by European
Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN) in Franco-Swiss border near
Switzerland. There are team of people dedicated to detail measurements, as
Cavendish did with his “flammable air”. And same process of logics by ‘Bill
Tutte’ in cryptography machine invention. These are simple principles yet they
hold great power. World’s half of Particle Physicist (Ten thousand I would say)
gathered at one place (CERN Research Center in Geneva), just because of
tantalizing the process what they might discover before collision. Scientists
gathered in group always build a common outcome expectation even before
experimentation. In July 2012, a new particle “Higgs boson” or common known
as ‘God particle’ been discovered. This sub-atomic particle jigsaw; which is
responsible for the building block of universe; has been in motion since the
beginning. This particle was named after the British scientist “Peter Higgs”;
who worked on this research scene 50 years earlier. The discovery is behind the
idea of CERN, but the reason that we have to be confident is that pain-taking
affords has been done to the design of experiment. Even funding for two
different groups of scientists on exactly on same thing. Both teams weren’t
allowed to discuss, even with each other. One group was known as ‘Atlas’
(Consist of 160 Institutes globally) and second was known as CMS. Both
performed their experiment independently, without any help of each other by
material or by knowledge. The interesting part was that ‘they both designed same
experiment’. This proves that there might be something interesting as comparing
with ‘Peter Higgs’ 50 years of research and investigation. © 2014 Talal Abbasi |
StatsAuthorTalal AbbasiParis, il-de-france, FranceAboutIndependent Researcher | Data Centre Engineer | Free Thinker | Accountant | Blogger Contact: https://talalabbasi.wordpress.com/contact-me/ more..Writing
|