The Snowflake Method

You might have heard of the Snowflake Method, but do you know what it is? This article explains it simply and reviews whether or not YOU need it.

(Hopefully this qualifies as an instructive lesson. The following article delves into what the Snowflake Method is, how it works, and discusses whether or not it will work for you. Thanks for reading.)

Randy Ingermanson's Snowflake Method

When it comes to writing a novel, there are a myriad and one different ways to go about it. Perhaps you’re a calculative individual, carefully outlining beginning to end of your future masterpiece. Or perhaps you’re a bit more like me, who might find a flash of inspiration, crafting an idea for something in your head and putting it down on paper; flying by the seat of your pants (as the term pantser comes from) while you paint your tale like an abstract picture.

    Now, everyone has something that works for them. As is with art, one person might sketch the model of their finished product with light strokes, later erasing those guidelines and meshing out the finished product. Others might simply draw, creating exactly what comes into their head as they go. The finished result in that case might not have the flawless, mathematical proportions that some hold dear, but in the end, it might be far more creative. To some, that’s beautiful. To others, amateurish. As I’m bound to repeat in this post, to each his or her own.

    Let’s bring a structured writing method into the spotlight: The Snowflake Method. If you’re an author, whether you write fiction, non-fiction, or anything in between, you’ve probably heard of this. Perhaps you’ve even used it. But for discussion’s sake, let’s pretend you’ve never heard the term in your life. This is my observations and opinions on the practice, as well as how I have seen others reactions to using it. If you’d rather hear exactly what the method entails before hearing a discussion on it, hop over here and read how it works for yourself (just be sure to come back after you’re done!).

    Regardless, I’ll highlight a bit of a crash course in the ten-step process that the Snowflake Method utilizes. In short, it’s the ultimate progressively constructive way to build your novel from the ground up, from scratch. You’re starting with nothing, you’re laying down the idea, and then over the course of what will probably take a few weeks to a month, you’re slowly building the groundwork for your story. Some might be immediately turned off to that sort of commitment of time to not even writing your novel itself (I certainly was). When you’re inspired, sometimes you have to capitalize on that. When you have the idea in your head, you don’t always want to write about writing the idea later on, you want to write it now! That’s a major failing of this method, but that doesn’t make it a bad way to go about things.

    Before I continue my analysis of the method, I’ll very briefly list the ten steps of Randy Ingermanson’s Snowflake Method. Ready? Go!

1. Take an hour to write a one-sentence summary of your novel.
2. Take another hour to expand that sentence into a summary of the novel; the setup, disasters, and ending.
3. Take an hour to write a one-page summary of each of your major characters.
4. Take several hours to expand each sentence of your summary paragraph into a paragraph of its own.
5. Take a day or two to write a one-page synopsis of each of your major characters, and a half-page synopsis of the other important characters.
6. Take a week to expand each paragraph of your story summary into a full page.
7. Take another week to expand the character synopses into full-fledged character charts detailing everything there is to know about each character.
8. Take your four-page story synopsis and place each scene involved into a spreadsheet list.
9. Take each line of the spreadsheet and expand it to a multi-paragraph description of the scene.
10. Begin writing your first draft.

    Right off the bat, you can tell how intensive this is. That can be a good thing or a bad thing, depending on your preferences as a writer, and even your personality. We’re not here to debate whether the method is right or wrong, since it’s arguably the most popular method around for writing a novel. As was highlighted on Randy’s page, the directions for how the method works gets over a thousand views a day. If that’s not popular, I don’t know what is.

    So let’s talk about the effectiveness of this practice. What’s good about it, what’s great about it, and what’s awful about it? Since I’m a rather positive guy (when I’m not trapped within the throes of agony and despair), we’ll start with what’s …

Great:
     If you have a problem with focus; putting your mind to something and sticking with it; this method could very well be your salvation. Novels are long. Stephen King novels are longer. Who knows how long yours will be, but odds are that at some point in your unguided journey of authorial discovery, you will develop a bad case of writer’s block. The Snowflake Method is a painstaking process, and while it can be fun, it takes time. The upside to the month or so you will take to lay the groundwork for your novel is that when you finally get to writing your novel, it should come much more smoothly. While carrying out those ten steps, you’re creating the skeleton of your novel, then slowly fleshing it out. When you’re done, all you have to do is write it. It gives you a heavy dose of focus.

Good:
     When it comes to characters, a lot of writers have a very hard time of making the character relatable. While they might have a good idea of the character they’re writing, and the emotions of that character, when they start writing their novel, those emotions simply don’t come across. Granted, this is my personal experience in reading, but I’d imagine many see the same thing. Utilizing the character building steps of the Snowflake Method literally drills your characters into your head. In step 3, you invite your characters over for dinner. In step 5, you let them spend the night on your sofa. By step 7, they’re literally snuggling in bed with you. This kind of extensive understanding of your characters and their emotions makes it far more likely that when you put them to paper, they will come alive. It’s not a sure thing, but it certainly doesn’t hurt.

Awful:
     I’m going to choose my words carefully here. This is a timeless method, and the people who are committed to it sometimes preach its effectiveness with evangelical assurance. All the same, it’s easy for anyone to see how this method could be very counter-productive to certain writers. Let’s be honest, the entire process could take over a month. That’s a long time to be writing… about writing. While to some the process might be fun and exciting and amazing, other writers will burn themselves out with the method. The incredible idea that inspired them to write has now become a chore as they systematically carry out each step. By the time they are actually done, the passion they had for writing on their idea has dwindled. They have a model of point A to point B, not inspired, written chapters that they can look at and say “Wow, this looks good!”. To some, that’s a terrible reason for the method to be called awful, but if you’re sitting there thinking that, that’s because you’re a planner. No two writers are alike.

    Since I’m an uneducated fool, I asked published author and teacher Steve Alcorn what he personally thought about the Snowflake Method. His response was:

” … You start with dramatic elements, and fill in the big plot details first, then the smaller ones. That’s really the only way to write a novel (other than simply starting at the beginning and hoping it goes somewhere). What it omits, however, is the important distinction between story and plot, and how they are reliant on each other, but with the story structure utmost.”

    Let me try to decipher that. Basically, while it’s a simple process that explains itself and builds a novel from the ground up, it doesn’t take the story into consideration through the process. That might sound odd, since it’s helping you build… well, your story. However, there’s a clear difference between story and plot.

    The plot of your story is what happens. If your protagonist is hurtling through country back-roads in his moonshine running hot-rod when suddenly his brakes go out, that’s plot. That’s what’s happening in your scene. When he slams on the brake pedal and realizes he’s headed straight for a tree, his heart pounding in his head, fear burning through his mind as he says a silent prayer for help, that’s story. The story (as opposed to plot) is the emotion behind your novel. It’s what your characters feel (since any novel worth it’s salt is going to be about a character or two).

    So through the Snowflake Method, you’re building what? Your plot. You’re setting out what’s going to happen, when, and with who in your novel. That’s all well and good, but during this process, there’s not a whole lot of room for the emotion behind your writing. On your Snowflake spreadsheet, Amy and Jack are going to have an argument in front of their kids. That’s a scene. However that says nothing about their daughter, who hides her tears and sobs in her teddy bear and wishes she was at Grandma’s house.

... or HER own!

    Regardless, it is true that this emotion (the story) can find life as you actually write the novel, once you’re finished with the ten step process. However through focusing on building exactly what is going to happen in your novel, it’s easy for the entire process to become robotic. It comes down to you, the writer, on how you will handle that. There are a great many methods of building a novel, but be forewarned that with the Snowflake Method, you do have to watch yourself for certain failings. There is a proper fit when it comes to any writer and any method of writing.

    From what I can see, a lot of writers take pieces of the Snowflake Method. It’s a bit simple, but it’s also extensive. That relates well into fragmented systems using portions of the ten step process. For example, when I researched this, I found that the character building steps might be a great idea for me.

    I do not plan. I do, but at the same time, I write by the seat of my pants. In my head, I know what’s going to happen at the end, and even some key events that will happen in between. However I leave myself a great deal of room so that my creative juices can flow, so to speak. It allows spontaneous action, honest character emotion and reaction, and a high level of leniency when it comes to the evolution of the story. In my working novel, Children of Solus, I know exactly what is going to happen at the end. I know quite a bit about my characters and what lies in store for them, but in between? The events sometimes surprise even me. However, like I said, the character building steps of the Snowflake method have inspired me to try them out. I’m all for getting to know my characters better, and I look forward to seeing how that helps my writing.

    That’s my method, and it works for me. Some writers wouldn’t be able to get anything done if they did it my way, but that’s just how writing is. What works for one does not work for another. As you learn what sort of writer you are, you’ll find what method works for you too. If the Snowflake Method does, that’s great! If you try it and it doesn’t, that’s alright too. Feel free to use pieces of it that do work for you. Just remember not to force yourself into a mold with it comes to your writing style. When you feel your creativity and inspiration is becoming cramped, odds are that your writing is going to show it. That’s not a good thing.

    So how about you? Have you used the Snowflake Method before? How did it work for you? Have you found another method (perhaps even your own) that has given you good results?

I invite you to leave a comment on your experiences!

Comments

beauitifulybroken

Posted 3 Months Ago I've always wanted to write a novel, but at times I get this deep intense feeling of need to write because I feel like it's going to poof and disappear before I can write it down. I found this article very helpful in the way that it would help to give those ideas some more structure to turn them into something more tangible. It sounds like you method may be similar, it's interesting to see that you can use both of those methods and be successful. Suppose I can take the time to commit to it, who knows. I guess we shall see. Thank you for this article, I found it very helpful. :)

E.A.Brown

Posted 6 Years Ago I would like to hear more about your method. When you talked about already knowing in your head how a story starts, the major events and how it ends, I realized that it was very similar to what happens with me. I have about a dozen scenes written that I'm sewing together to make a story.

Star Angel

Posted 7 Years Ago I'm currently using this method, and it works wonders for me. I'm on step 9, and I love where my novel's going. I can leave it for a few days, and easily come back to it without a second thought. I use to have problems coming back to a project that I wasn't consistently working on because I would lose sight of what I was doing. This method helped keep me on track. It is a long process though. I've been working on it for about four months. Luckily, I'm about a third of the way through step 9, so I'll be writing my first draft by summer. :)

MesmericManuscript

Posted 8 Years Ago I honestly have never heard of this method before. I got the software and am enjoying it immensely. There has been an idea sitting in my head for a good two months now, but when I sit down to write things out, I go blank-- or think that my research is from a faulty source... and then dive further into countless hours--checking my sources to see if they are legitimate. I really really thank you for this. You inspired the birth of my novel (hopefully novel) by sharing this! I am usually a poetry writer only, and even had hard times with short stories. With this method, I feel empowered thus far. Thanks again!

JLD

Posted 9 Years Ago I found this information relevant and useful. I will try out this method on my next story. I hope I have the patience to work through all of the steps at least once so that I can see what works for me and what doesn't, but I understand that I don't have to use every step either. Thank you for the post!

pinkcookie

Posted 9 Years Ago Thank you, this article is very helpful. I have been writing for many years now but I have never been a structured writer so I would like to try this out. I'm not going to follow all the steps, but a few are really handy.

TWBookmiss

Posted 10 Years Ago I have been writing for many years. This was the first place that actually explained Plot and Story. I appreciate the difference. I was confused with this method but you have explained it well. I don't know that its what I am looking for. I am looking for a templat to link the characters and actions in a flow chart/snowflake look to make sure I have the plot/side stories connecting in the right way, not just me writing to the end. This is a new adventure for me.

Tammy J Rizzo

Posted 11 Years Ago I pressed this on I am very glad to have someone talk about the pros and the cons of the Snowflake Method. It seems like it would be very helpful, as long as we are able to keep the emotions in mind while we work it out. Thank you for this post.

Creativemama

Posted 11 Years Ago Thank you for this wonderful article. I have heard of the snowflake method but have never gone the details of this paradigm. Thank you for your help.