Planned Immigration Sales & Marketing

A bit of Prose relatable Poetry styled article on a very controversial and often debatable topic that should be of interest to all peoples and nations of this world ...

Planned Immigration Sales And Marketing

Written By Marvin Thomas Cox-Flynn de Graham

Copyright © 2014 Marvin Thomas Cox

DBA: Marvin Thomas Cox-Flynn de Graham

All Rights Reserved

I have yet to meet anyone who is against immigration. Without immigration, very few of us would be here today. Immigration is healthy, natural, and good for the growth of most any nation. The argument over immigration is not really about the topic of immigration at all, but about explaining away why our borders remain undefended to this very day, while other nations secure their borders without opposition from enraged protesters .

In my personal view, our weakest border is not, necessarily, our southern border, though it attracts the most attention. Our weakest, undefended, border is, quite possibly, our northern border with Canada. Now Canada is our friend and ally, but so, also, is Mexico, so why the differentiation in the way we treat one friendly nation over the other?

Is it because we presume that Canada shall always be our friend and never our enemy? Is it because we presume our nation could never be invaded from the north, but can be invaded from the south?

The facts of history reveal that we have fought wars against both of these nations: The war of 1812 (1812-1815) against Canada as a part of the British Empire, and the Mexican-American War (1846-1848) against Mexico, both caused largely by American expansionist designs upon both nations (i.e.: The Doctrine of Manifest Destiny¹). Yet, we treat Mexico differently.

Have we forgotten the war of 18121, when the United States launched an attack against Canada (then a territory of The United Kingdom) in expansionist justification and reprisal for British attempts to restrict U.S. Trade? Is it because we presume our nation could never be invaded from the north, but can be invaded from the south? A careful look at history will dispel any such delusions that would have us believe that our nation cannot be invaded from the north ...

The truth is, our nation can be invaded along any given border at any given time by those who wish to do so, and possess the means to do so. Right now many people, south of the U.S., who wish to enter our country are flying to Canada and entering our nation illegally from the north unhindered and undetected. This is common knowledge among Hispanic people (my wife, and kids, and her family, are, in fact, American Hispanic citizens).

What is the harm being done then? None in most cases, unless true terrorists are also crossing our northern border, as most folks that come here just want to work and make an honest living (Hispanic people, from any nation, are, perhaps, among the hardest working folks on the planet), and who can blame them for that? Except!

Except for the fact -- and it truly amazes me -- that so many advocate planned parenthood² in dealing with unwanted pregnancies and in planning a family, and yet no thought is given to the concept of planned immigration. Too much of anything at one time is a bad thing, as we all know. At harvest time on the farm or come shipping time at the local manufacturing plant, time and processing must be invested and undertaken in order to cull poor and defective product from good and acceptable product. The process of inspecting and culling defective, unsafe, undesirable, product before presentation to the public is a common practice of sales and marketing.

Why is it so hard to see that the same concept of sales and marketing should also apply to immigration, along with sound planning as is applied to the concept of planned parenthood?

To plan after the fact, after defective products hit the metaphorical market and shelves of our nation -- to plan for children after conception and the arrival of children without the proper means of support -- is a tad too little planning much too late, don't you think?

____________

While you ponder upon my question, let's take a momentary break from our ongoing conversation of why is it so hard to see that the same concept of sales and marketing should also apply to immigration, along with sound planning as is applied to the concept of planned parenthood, and take a sincerely scrutinous look at an incredulously incomprehensible anomaly. Shall we? We will simply refer to this intermission as an article-within-an-article ...

An incredulously incomprehensible anomaly? Those who adamantly claim to be Pro-Choice, citing the need for population control in view of the alleged presence and threat of world overpopulation, also tend to walk hand in hand with those who advocate leniency in border control as though they were unspoken Globalist members of that UNESCO³ (United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization) spawned covert creation that is making handy use of Media harnessed, emotion based, social influence in order to promote and promulgate an insidiously preemptive predecessor movement that exists as a virtual reality accomplice and supportive partner to the UN's heinous introductory plan to assume control and ownership of all the Earth's land and natural resources -- a plan that nullifies all individual personal rights to land and resource ownership in favor of Socialist Communitarian ideals of One World ownership facilitated and orchestrated by an eventual United Nations administrated One World form of government -- euphemistically disguised by the terminology Sustainable Development Goals (Keep a wary eye open in your community for this euphemistic terminology and learn its true meaning & intent!) in order to deceptively cloak its UN origins as United Nations Agenda 21⁴ (see Democrats Against Agenda 21⁵) which was signed off on by former President George H.W. Bush, and has now been transformationally surpassed in its outright blatant heinousness by the breach birth of a new sibling agenda (United Nations Agenda 2030⁶) that provides for very near future terminal malignancy deprivation of the very breath and life of individuals rights in further enhancing United Nations empowerment over all citizens of this world: Nations Without Borders⁷

Hence, according to this anomalous illogical logic, described just above, it is perfectly okay to abort a fetus (terminate the life of an unborn child) to prevent overpopulation of our nation and the world, while it is, in the same illogically breathtaking breathe of incomprehensibility, perfectly okay to allow America to become packed like a can of sardines with illegal immigrants who choose to breach America's borders -- our home as American Citizens and, thus, not immigrants at all, but let us call a spade a spade (no racial connotation intended) and clarify, exactly what they are, and what they are is: Intruders; Border Breaching Home Invasion Intruders, regardless of whatever pure intents and motive they believe they may have for doing so -- while disrespecting our nation's laws against such acts -- unlawful acts that violate laws which are predicated upon our nation's Constitution and Declaration of Independence (the very essence of what makes America, America, a nation like no other on Earth), as they (intentionally or not) spit in the face of all that America is and all that we are as Americans. And in the very same breath of spitting in the face of our nation, spitting in our faces as American citizens, these Border-Breaching-Home-Invading-Intruders arrogantly seek to justify their actions by attempting to use our nation's Statue of Liberty, and its poetically displayed words, against us as a belligerently preposterous means to continue their illegal assault upon our land:

“Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, the wretched refuse of your teeming shore,” she wrote. “Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me, I lift my lamp beside the golden door!”

An obvious fact of reality that is not proclaimed in the preposterously railing claiming and ignorantly attested supposition that would have us stupidly believe that folks have some sort of right to invade our land, our nation, our home, simply because they claim to wish to possess and live a better life? The famous poem displayed at the Statue of Liberty, speaks to those who would enter this nation legally in respecting and embracing all that is America, its laws, its Constitution, and its Declaration of Independence. The perverted and twisted use of this poem fails to point out that this very poem surely denies entrance access to those, any and all regardless of alleged circumstances, who fail to respect and recognize the laws of this land called The United States of America -- a nation that was founded upon America's Declaration of Independence and Constitution.

Let's put this way by way of an example (bear in mind I love Hispanic people, am married to a Hispanic woman & love the people of Mexico) that bears forth the fruit of useful logic and reason: Picture yourself seeking to better yourself, no matter the circumstances or reasons for wishing to do so, as you stand just across the street from the property and home of a Mexican family in Mexico, or an American Hispanic family right here in the good ole U.S.A., for in this instanced example it makes no never mind. Outside there are signs of law that clearly state in several languages, including your own: No Trespassing … Private Property … Survivors Will Be Prosecuted.

Now, simply take it upon yourself to cross that street in defiance of those highly informative warning signs, step onto the property of that family of folks, and enter their home by whatever means you can imaginatively manage in accomplishing your personal desire to better yourself -- a desire that fails to take into account the wishes of that family upon whom you are encroaching and intruding in your brazen unlawful act of Home Invasion. Is there anyone of us who doubts that the man of that house, or perhaps even a woman in that home, will greet such an uninvited intruder with a violent reprisal, possibly even a deadly reprisal, in defense of their home and land upon which they live? The fact is Hispanic people (remember I have been a member of a Hispanic family for over 40 years) tend to do more than just frown upon those who would reveal themselves as Intruders and Home Invaders. One would do well to leave that home in an ambulance -- and that alive …

But, here's the true a*s pinching clincher to all the endless border drama unfolding each and every day, right here in America: Having absorbed the information I have provided above, regarding UNESCO, the Nation's Without Borders movement that is fueled by UNESCO, and United Nations Agendas 21 & 2030 -- both of which are currently operating simultaneously in tandem together, but upon different levels of influence worldwide -- Agenda 21 doing its dirtiest damnedest at the local community level, while Agenda 2030⁸ carries out its dastardly bastardy mission at state and national levels -- in a round about, but rationally logical, fashion, one could simply state that the border dilemma currently experienced by America is a direct result of The United Nations, UNESCO, United Nations Agenda 21 and United Nations Agenda 2030 covert influenced mechanization operations at work well behind the scenes in an attempt to bring The United States of America in line with its directives -- fully in tow of compliance cooperation and subjugation to the will of those Powers Behind The Thrones who do, in reality rule the United Nations and steer the course of its directive directions and agendas.

So does it, really, take a rocket scientist to cipher out, exactly, why those assailing our borders behave as though they have a right to maliciously execute an outright migratory immigration infiltration of our nation, our home, in outright defiance of our borders and our nation's laws? Hell no! The answer is one of simplistically simpleton ignorance -- the simplistically simpleton ignorance of, we, the American people who, to this very moment in time, remain almost totally unaware of United Nations Agenda 21 and United Nations Agenda 2030, much less aware and comprehendingly cognizant of these wicked twin sister agenda's implications for America and American sovereignty. What does this statement of fact have to do with those who assail our borders? Every friggin' thing, because those who, daily assail our borders are well informed and fully aware -- via United Nations Agendas 21 and 2030 -- the United Nations has, in all fullness of stark a*s reality, empowered them to assail our borders at will -- cross our borders, occupy, and take up residence within our nation. And this empowerment shall continue and prevail, unless we come to grips with understanding that the outcome of the border dilemma facing our nation today shall determine the future of our nation in the very near tomorrows of the not so distant future.

If you love this nation and wish to preserve its integrity of rights for all of its citizens (for yourself and your children and grandchildren after you) it is time to wake the f#*k up and smell the roses of what is transpiring in this world around us -- exert a determined effort to become well and accurately informed about the UN's manipulative agendas and policies and events taking place somewhere besides your own living room or backyard -- then, it is damn sure high time to take and make a stand for America and every culture, religion, and complexion of representative American citizens who reside here in America, proudly calling America home. Take and make a stand to support definitively securing our nation's borders from those who would seek to cross our borders illegally.

____________

Shall we continue with our minds, now, correctly aligned with the facts of logic, reason, and the preservation of the sovereignty of our nation?

Having had a bit of time to ponder my question presented, above: To plan after the fact, after defective products hit the metaphorical market and shelves of our nation -- to plan for children after conception and the arrival of children without the proper means of support -- is a tad too little planning much too late, don't you think? The answer is a simple one.

Quite obviously, it truly would be too late. And so it is also true with attempting to implement an immigration plan that deals with the problem after it has already arrived, rather than intelligently planning and processing each and every eager and needed immigrant arrival to our country and their new homeland. It is more than high time to stop pointing political fingers and do something beneficially positive to protect the borders and sovereignty of our nation before it is too late.

Yes, common sense does, indeed, dictate, that in the interest of protecting the bordered sovereignty of our nation, we must deal with the situation at hand, but, rather than talking, theorizing, speculating, and arguing, at some point in time -- as in a time before it is too damn late -- a real plan for controlled immigration must be arrived at and implemented, or else we will soon become a nation of uninvited and unwelcome illegal immigrants (Border Breaching Home Invading Intruders) run a muck.

Why is it that our elected officials, working in government, cannot apply this same simple logic that is applied to business, marketing, and planned parenthood each and every day? And what's more, why do they continue on -- the blind leading the blind as they stumble around in the darkness of impure motives and political agendas of seeking control and power, regardless of political or ideological affiliation, rather than what is truly best for America -- in their incessantly blatant refusal to admit and acknowledge that America's illegal immigration problem represents a very real and ominous threat to the very future of America if left unchecked and unimpeded?

We must secure our borders, including our northern border, from possible military and terrorist attacks, as well as unlawful incursions by migratory illegal immigrants, and forcefully redirect the flow of immigration to lawfully designated points of properly authorized entry and processing in order to navigate immigrants into this country in a planned, methodical, caring and humane process -- thereby, making immigration an honorable and legal process, once more, rather than an illegally uninhibited process that is assuredly detrimental to the safety, security, sovereignty, and future of our nation. When this importantly urgent goal is accomplished, then, and only then, will the word immigrant be spoken of with pride in America, once again.

The simple fact is that, when countless millions of people dare to cross the borders of any sovereign nation upon this earth, and that crossing occurring uninvited and without that nation's governmental granted permission, such a situation is not a matter of immigration at all, but is in fact an invasion of that nation. An invasion launched against any nation or people is most generally associated and received as an act of war. An invading force need not be armed with guns, tanks, or planes, to effectively achieve their objective, especially if the nation being invaded offers little or no resistance to the human flood of invading forces.

Ask yourself a simple theoretical question: If Mexico bordered with Iran, how would illegal immigrants crossing Iran's border be greeted? Now, apply this theoretical situation to Mexico bordering with Russia or China …

We must secure every American border from the possibility of military and terrorist attack, as well as Border Breaching Illegal Immigrant Intruder Invasion, and force the flow of those sincerely desiring to immigrate to America back to New York Harbor where it once was and perhaps always should be, or select other points of proper entry and processing in helping to navigate immigrant applicants into this country in a planned, methodical, caring and humane process, making immigration a legal process of desirable future citizens, rather than an ever increasing onslaught of illegal trespassers invading our nation. We must return the term immigrant to its once honorable status as a word that can be spoken with pride, and represents future loyal American citizens who have proven themselves obedient to American laws through the process of entering this nation in a, legally, lawful manner.

At the same time, The very proposed notion of building a mere physical wall along our Southern Border (a proposed wall giving forth the illusion of security, as well as the impression of walling undesirables out and Americans in) , is not only fundamentally preposterous but, is likely to be found offensive to our southern neighbor and friendly ally nation of Mexico. We must find a way to secure our borders without antagonizing our bordering neighboring nations, if at all possible. However, our borders must be secured, and a secure southern border benefits, not only the U.S. but, Mexico as well in that our southern border, secured, becomes their northern border, secured.

Every nation must defend, protect, and monitor its borders in order to remain a sovereign nation. However, to date, there is no such thing as a physical wall that cannot be flown over, tunneled under, or bulldozed down.

An intelligent use of modern technology to detect intruders and defend our borders is a much more sensible and plausible means of dealing with the current situation, perhaps, even coupled with a physical wall in order to assist in settling the dispute over the obvious reality that our southern border is, daily, being overrun and violated by intruders entering our homeland unlawfully.

In addition, common sense should dictate that if immigration for hard working individuals, seeking to come to America and make a home and life for themselves here, became more readily obtainable in assuring the filtering out of undesirables (those who certifiably prove themselves to truly hold American ideals & values in high esteem), then the only traffic our nation would have to deal with along our Southern Border (any border) would be illegal, harmful, and detrimental, traffic (drug & or terrorist related) which could and should be dealt with by the use of deadly military force to repel and discourage any such invaders from their attempts to penetrate our borders for profit or whatever subversive agenda.

As Americans who love our country, we must come to understand that the means by which we currently protect our nation's borders must be redesigned, reconfigured, and implemented along lines of logical sensibilities that will bring about the effective filtering out of dangerous undesirables, while insuring a fair and regulated flow of valuable and needed desirable persons into our nation, for the future of America is not to be found in wealth or technology, but in people -- human resources that treasure our nation's Declaration of Independence, Constitution, ideals, and way of life.

History offers to us a lesson, and a strong warning: Europeans did not, in reality, immigrate to America, for to do so would have required the invitation, permission, and approval of the Native Americans who lived here upon this land we now occupy. The truth is, Europeans literally invaded America -- intruded into the home of Native Americans -- via the same type of flood that is daily flowing across our (southern) borders, unchecked and unimpeded to date. America is being invaded once again, and (to reiterate) it is damn sure high time to wake up and smell the roses of that unpleasant truth.

After all, unless we share Native American blood, we were once all (each of us, at least, ancestrally) immigrants in this great land called America -- The United States of America ...

Please do read and mentally digest the Evidential Footnotes given in the Note for Reviewers, below.

(Written June 2nd, 2014 -- updated & revised November 18th, 2017 & January 10^th, 2019)

Author's Note

EVIDENTIAL FOOTNOTES:

1 The Doctrine of Manifest Destiny — https://www.britannica.com/event/Manifest-Destiny

2 For The Record: I am a Women's Rights Pro Life Advocate, believing fully that a woman has the right of control of her own body, while also attesting that all women should be fully informed of the irreversible consequence of aborting their unborn child, consequences much like suicide in that there is no turning back, and no changing what has been done, once undertaken. Tragically, women are, all too often, totally and cluelessly unaware that abortion is BIG BUSINESS; a world wide business that well exceeds trillions of dollars in profits for Bio-Tech Companies who are provided with living fetal tissue by Fetal Tissue Brokerage Companies that cleverly circumvent established laws forbidding the sale of fetal tissue, designating that fetal tissue may be obtained by nonprofit donation only after expenses of preserving, maintaining, and transporting such tissue have been deducted — expenses that are grossly exaggerated in order to generate hidden and protected profits to pad the pocket books of those who peddle human flesh (fetal cells of some aborted children kept alive for in excess of 20 years after their mother's have ousted them from the womb & that mother ABSOLUTELY NOT fully informed of these facts) nurtured and preserved, alive for use by researchers who devote their lives to developing new Bio-Technology, such as taste enhancers, created through the use aborted fetal cells, to spike and spark up the flavor of our favorite soft drinks as a means of generating sales for companies such as Pepsi Cola, though Pepsi now claims that it will no longer make us of fetal cell developed taste enhancers. For more information, please see my article posted at scribd.com: https://www.scribd.com/document/319872199/The-Insidiously-Nefarious-Hydra-Entity-That-is-the-Abortion-Industry-by-Marvin-Thomas-Cox-Flynn

3 UNESCO — United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization: UNESCO is the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. It seeks to build peace through international cooperation in Education, the Sciences and Culture. UNESCO's programmes contribute to the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals defined in Agenda 2030, adopted by the UN General Assembly in 2015. https://en.unesco.org/about-us/introducing-unesco

4 United Nation's Agenda 21 — Agenda 21 For Dummies — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TzEEgtOFFlM

5Democrats against Agenda 21 — “... UN Agenda 21/Sustainable Development is the action plan implemented worldwide to inventory and control all land, all water, all minerals, all plants, all animals, all construction, all means of production, all energy, all education, all information, and all human beings in the world. INVENTORY AND CONTROL.----Rosa Koire


Considering its policies are woven into all the General Plans of the cities and counties, it's important for people to know where these policies are coming from. While many people support the United Nations for its 'peacemaking' efforts, hardly anyone knows that they have very specific land use policies that they would like to see implemented in every city, county, state and nation. The specific plan is called United Nations Agenda 21 Sustainable Development, which has its basis in Communitarianism. By now, most Americans have heard of sustainable development but are largely unaware of Agenda 21.

In a nutshell, the plan calls for governments to take control of all land use and not leave any of the decision making in the hands of private property owners. It is assumed that people are not good stewards of their land and the government will do a better job if they are in control. Individual rights in general are to give way to the needs of communities as determined by the governing body. Moreover, people should be rounded up off the land and packed into human settlements, or islands of human habitation, close to employment centers and transportation. Another program, called the Wildlands Project spells out how most of the land is to be set aside for non-humans.

U.N. Agenda 21 cites the affluence of Americans as being a major problem which needs to be corrected. It calls for lowering the standard of living for Americans so that the people in poorer countries will have more, a redistribution of wealth. Although people around the world aspire to achieve the levels of prosperity we have in our country, and will risk their lives to get here, Americans are cast in a very negative light and need to be taken down to a condition closer to average in the world. Only then, they say, will there be social justice which is a cornerstone of the U.N. Agenda 21 plan ...” https://www.democratsagainstunagenda21.com

6 United Nations Agenda 2030 — https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I90ka-Br5CQ & https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zfMxsrcr1D0

7 Nations Without Borders — Nations Without Borders is a global current affairs series featuring stories from members of the World Indigenous Television Broadcasters Network (WITBN). Fronted by Oriini Kaipara, the series is produced by Australia's National Indigenous Television (NITV) and includes contributions from NITV, Māori Television, ‘Oiwi TV in Hawai’i, Canada's Aboriginal People’s Television Network (APTN) and Taiwan Indigenous Television (TITV). https://www.maoritelevision.com/shows/nations-without-borders

8 Agenda 2030 — UN Agenda 2030: A Recipe for Global Socialism — The United Nations and its mostly autocratic member regimes have big plans for your life, your children, your country, and your world. And those plans are not limited to the coercive “climate” agreement recently concluded in Paris.


While the establishment media in the United States was hyping ISIS, football, and of course “global warming,” virtually every national government/dictatorship on the planet met at the 70th annual General Assembly at UN headquarters in New York to adopt a draconian 15-year master plan for the planet. Top globalists such as former NATO chief Javier Solana, a socialist, are celebrating the plan, which the summit unanimously “approved,” as the next “Great Leap Forward” — yes, the old campaign slogan of the Chinese Communist Party.

The master plan is comprised of 17 “Post-2015 Sustainable Development Goals” (SDGs) with 169 specific “targets” to be foisted on all of humanity — literally all of it, as the plan itself states explicitly. “As we embark on this collective journey, we pledge that no one will be left behind,” reads the UN manifesto, entitled Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. But if you love liberty, self-government, free markets, or the U.S. Constitution, you will almost certainly be wishing that the UN would leave you behind.

Officially dubbed “Agenda 2030,” the UN plot, as its full title suggests, is aimed at “transforming” the world. The program is a follow-up to the last 15-year UN plan, the defunct “Millennium Development Goals,” or MDGs. It also dovetails nicely with the deeply controversial UN Agenda 21, even including much of the same rhetoric and agenda. But the combined Agenda 2030 goals for achieving what is euphemistically called “sustainable development” represent previous UN plans on steroids — deeper, more radical, more draconian, and more expensive.

“This Agenda is a plan of action for people, planet and prosperity,” reads the preamble. “All countries and all stakeholders, acting in collaborative partnership, will implement this plan.” Ironically, the preamble even claims the UN goals will “free the human race from the tyranny of poverty” and “heal” the planet — or, as the planet is also referred to in the document, “Mother Earth.” Not-so-subtly purporting to usurp the role of God, the UN even claimed that the “future of humanity and of our planet lies in our hands.”

Speaking on September 25 at the opening ceremony of the confab that adopted Agenda 2030, Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon hinted at just how far-reaching the plot really is. “The new agenda is a promise by leaders to all people everywhere,” he explained, presumably conflating “leaders” with mass-murdering gangsters such as Kim Jong-un, Raul Castro, Robert Mugabe, and other despots who hold great sway with most of the regimes comprising the United Nations. “It is a universal, integrated and transformative vision for a better world.” “We need action from everyone, everywhere,” Ban said, pointing to the “guide” offered by the 17 SDGs. “They are a to-do list for people and planet, and a blueprint for success.” “We must use the goals to transform the world,” Ban continued. “Institutions will have to become fit for a grand new purpose.”

The Agenda 2030 agreement makes the audacity of the scheme clear, too. “This is an Agenda of unprecedented scope and significance,” boasts the document. “Never before have world leaders pledged common action and endeavor across such a broad and universal policy agenda,” the agreement continues. “What we are announcing today — an Agenda for global action for the next fifteen years — is a charter for people and planet in the twenty-first century.”



The Agenda



Perhaps the single most striking feature of Agenda 2030 is the practically undisguised roadmap to global socialism and corporatism/fascism, as countless analysts have pointed out. To begin with, consider the agenda’s Goal 10, which calls on the UN, national governments, and every person on Earth to “reduce inequality within and among countries.” To do that, the agreement continues, will “only be possible if wealth is shared and income inequality is addressed.”

As the UN document also makes clear, national socialism to “combat inequality” domestically is not enough — international socialism is needed to battle inequality even “among” countries. “By 2030, ensure that all men and women, in particular the poor and the vulnerable, have equal rights to economic resources,” the document demands. In simpler terms, Western taxpayers should prepare to be fleeced so that their wealth can be redistributed internationally as their own economies are cut down to size by Big Government. Of course, as has been the case for generations, most of the wealth extracted from the productive sector will be redistributed to the UN and Third World regimes — not the victims of those regimes, impoverished largely through domestic socialist/totalitarian policies imposed by the same corrupt regimes to be propped up with more Western aid under Agenda 2030.

Wealth redistribution alone, however, will not be enough. Governments must also seize control of the means of production — either directly or through fascist-style mandates. “We commit to making fundamental changes in the way that our societies produce and consume goods and services,” the document states. It also says that “governments, international organizations, the business sector and other non-state actors and individuals must contribute to changing unsustainable consumption and production patterns … to move towards more sustainable patterns of consumption and production.”

In plain English, the Agenda 2030 document is claiming that today’s “consumption and production” patterns are unsustainable, so we’ll need to get by with less. How much less? It would be hard to find a more clear and concise assessment than that offered by the late Maurice Strong, the recently deceased Canadian billionaire and longtime UN environmental guru who led the 1992 Earth Summit, in a pre-Earth Summit document: “It is clear that current lifestyles and consumption patterns of the affluent middle-class … involving high meat intake, consumption of large amounts of frozen and ‘convenience’ foods, ownership of motor vehicles, numerous electrical appliances, home and workplace air-conditioning ... expensive suburban housing … are not sustainable.”

In truth, such “lifestyles and consumption patterns” are sustainable, so long as the freedom that makes prosperity possible is not destroyed in the name of achieving “sustainability.” The UN and the environmental lobby claim that we must get by with less because there are now too many people on the planet consuming too many resources. But this rationale for accepting UN-imposed scarcity is patently false.


Of course, the promoters of Agenda 2030 would claim that rather than impoverish us, the global regime they envision would take good care of us — through universal health coverage, for instance. One of the targets for Goal 3, ensuring “healthy lives” and “well-being,” is: “Achieve universal health coverage,” including “vaccines for all.” Universal access to “mental health,” along with “sexual and reproductive health-care services” — code words for abortion and contraception — are also included. All governments are expected to integrate such services into their “national strategies and programmes,” the agreement demands.

It is worth noting that mass-murdering Soviet dictator Vladimir Lenin made clear that controlled healthcare is the “keystone” of socialism. The United Nations obviously agrees. And though he may not call it “socialism,” Obama undoubtedly also views government control of healthcare as key. Indeed, enactment of ObamaCare could be viewed as a “great leap forward” by the United States toward implementation of a key component of Agenda 2030, before Agenda 2030 was even “approved.”

But as important as targeting healthcare is to the globalist schemers, any plan for building international socialism would be lacking without also targeting the next generation with global-socialist propaganda. And so an entire goal of Agenda 2030 is devoted to ensuring that all children, everywhere, are transformed into what the UN calls “agents of change,” ready to push forward the plan for the new global order. “Children and young women and men are critical agents of change and will find in the new Goals a platform to channel their infinite capacities for activism into the creation of a better world,” the agreement explains.

The sort of activists that the UN hopes to make your children into is also explicitly defined in the agreement. “By 2030, ensure that all learners acquire the knowledge and skills needed to promote sustainable development, including, among others, through education for sustainable development and sustainable lifestyles, human rights, gender equality, promotion of a culture of peace and non-violence, global citizenship and appreciation of cultural diversity and of culture’s contribution to sustainable development,” the global plan for 2030 states. Considering what the UN means by “sustainable development” — population control, central planning, global governance, and more — the agenda for your children takes on an even more sinister tone.

“Sustainable” children for global citizenship in the new order will be accomplished via what the UN misleadingly refers to as “education.” In the UN document the word “education” alone is mentioned more than 20 times. And throughout the agreement, the UN openly advocates the use of schools to indoctrinate all of humanity into a new set of values, attitudes, and beliefs in preparation for the new “green” and “sustainable” world order. The UN’s education agenda also puts sex “education” front and center. “By 2030, ensure universal access to sexual and reproductive health-care services [abortion and contraception], including for family planning, information and education,” the document explains.

How much will Agenda 2030 cost? Various figures have been thrown around by UN bureaucrats regarding the monetary costs of the plan, generally ranging between $3 trillion and $5 trillion per year.

Yes, trillions. In the “From Billions to Trillions” report released by the World Bank in July 2015, the globalist outfit, a key player in Agenda 2030, conceded: “To meet the investment needs of the Sustainable Development Goals, the global community needs to move the discussion from ‘Billions’ in ODA [Official Development Assistance] to ‘Trillions’ in investments of all kinds: public and private, national and global, in both capital and capacity.”

But the money needed to implement Agenda 2030 and other UN schemes is only part of the cost. Other parts include the loss of our national independence and freedom that the rise of global governance and global socialism would surely entail. Revealingly, empowering dictators to help in global governance is openly touted by Agenda 2030. The document states, “We recommit to broadening and strengthening the voice and participation of developing countries [the regimes ruling those countries] — including African countries, least developed countries, land-locked developing countries, small-island developing States and middle-income countries — in international economic decision-making, norm-setting and global economic governance.”



Powerful Promoters


When Agenda 2030 was adopted at the 70th annual UN General Assembly confab in New York City on September 25, the UN plot to re-engineer civilization was ushered in with a “thunderous standing ovation,” the UN Department of Public Information reported. Every one of the 193 UN member governments on the planet — from murderous communist and Islamist dictatorships to those ruling what remains of the “Free World” — vowed to help impose the UN’s controversial goals on their subjects.

It all sounded so wonderful to some of the world’s most brutal dictators that they could hardly contain their glee. “This agenda promises a brave new world, a new world which we have to consciously construct, a new world that calls for the creation of a new global citizen,” gushed Marxist dictator Robert Mugabe, the genocidal mass-murderer enslaving Zimbabwe who also serves as chairman of the African Union. “I want to believe that we are up to this task that we have voluntarily and collectively committed ourselves to. Our success, and in particular the promise of a new world that awaits us, depends upon this commitment.” He also promised to vigorously impose the UN Agenda 2030 on the starving and impoverished victims his regime lords over with Agenda 2030-style policies. The communist Castro regime vowed to work with socialist Venezuelan strongman Nicolas Maduro and other tyrants to impose the UN goals on their victims, too — all with financing from Western taxpayers.

The brutal tyrants ruling Communist China, meanwhile, have also been enthusiastic cheerleaders for the UN goals — goals that the regime boasted it played a “crucial role” in developing. The Chinese autocracy, infamous for forced abortions, censorship, religious and political persecution, the “one-child policy,” terrible pollution, kangaroo courts, and of course, murdering more human beings than any other entity in all of human history, used its vast, global propaganda machine to celebrate Agenda 2030.

“China has made important contributions to the global efforts in reaching a fair, inclusive and sustainable post-2015 development agenda,” the regime’s deputy permanent representative to the UN, Wang Min, was quoted as saying in a report by the Communist Chinese news and espionage service Xinhua. “China is also very active in putting forward Chinese proposals…. The agreement includes important proposals by China and many other developing countries in numerous aspects.”

Among other “commitments,” China promised to spend $2 billion in foreign countries to meet the UN goals in “education” and “health,” with its funding increasing to $12 billion by 2030. While only contributing a small piece of the pie, the fact that Beijing is so excited about the agenda is quite revealing. Echoing Chairman Mao’s rhetoric, EU and NATO globalist Javier Solana said, “With a sustained commitment from all countries, developed and developing alike, the world can ensure that it celebrates another great leap forward in 2030.” (Emphasis added.) The last “Great Leap Forward,” presided over by Chairman Mao Tse-tung between 1958 and 1963, resulted in the murder of an estimated 45 million Chinese who were worked, starved, or beaten to death.

The Obama administration, which apparently does not plan to present the UN scheme to the U.S. Senate for ratification as required by the U.S. Constitution, also offered a forceful defense of the UN agenda. Speaking to the UN General Assembly on September 27, 2015, after purporting to commit the United States to the global plot, Obama claimed the UN blueprint “is one of the smartest investments we can make in our own future.”

Even the world’s leading religious figure, Pope Francis, addressed UN member governments with a plea to support the UN goals. “The adoption of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development ... is an important sign of hope,” he declared, before demanding a UN “climate” regime as well.

Beyond governments and religious figures, much of the private sector also enthusiastically backed the new goals. Among the mega-corporations backing the scheme are the world’s top three search engines: Google, Microsoft’s Bing, and Yahoo. It was not immediately clear whether those corporations’ support for the UN agenda would affect the supposed impartiality of search results, but critics of the UN plan expressed alarm nonetheless.


For now, at least, the world and the White House are all pretending that the SDGs are binding on Americans, too. However, the U.S. Senate was not consulted, as the Constitution requires for all treaties. And even if the Senate were to ratify it, the federal government cannot grant itself new anti-constitutional powers merely by approving a treaty. Therefore, the agreement has no force in the United States. But as UN Agenda 21 showed clearly, that does not mean that the Obama administration, and possibly future presidents, would not attempt to push it forward anyway. The American people, therefore, must demand through their elected representatives that the UN power grab be stopped. https://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/environment/item/22267-un-agenda-2030-a-recipe-for-global-socialism