I like the way you structured this, in a way. It certainly broke convention, and that's what poetry is supposed to do. The message was great, that before one can fully understand something well enough to rebel against it, one must first become a part of it. Like me and Christianity, but that's another story.
In a way, the poem is confusing in the layout. I also don't understand the use of "Leberate" instead of "liberate," and I'm not sure that you even needed that word in there. It's a good, clear message, but I'm not sure that the layout enhances it; it may just confuse the issue.
this certainly does have an e.e. cummings feel to it ... both in it's layout and structure and in it's sentiment ... cummings was so successful because he knew grammar so well he knew how to make his own rules and make them work and often we fall short on making our experimental poetry work because there is a point to grammar, in establishing a guideline and structure that makes the difficult task of communicating to one another possible ... i always felt that he profoundly rebelled against it only because he was so knowledgeable of it ... just as you say here ... and i can see here that you have found a way to profoundly rebel against it, as well ... profoundly being the key since many rebel but few succeed with such effect ...
And then went down to the ship, Set keel to breakers, forth on the godly sea, and . . . Ezra Pound (TCOEP).
About
" My life goal? Literary Immortality--without compromise. "
" I would rather be skydiving while writing a book. "
philosopher & polymath
Author of the unpublished masterpiece PROTEAN NotUnTit.. more..