I like the way you structured this, in a way. It certainly broke convention, and that's what poetry is supposed to do. The message was great, that before one can fully understand something well enough to rebel against it, one must first become a part of it. Like me and Christianity, but that's another story.
In a way, the poem is confusing in the layout. I also don't understand the use of "Leberate" instead of "liberate," and I'm not sure that you even needed that word in there. It's a good, clear message, but I'm not sure that the layout enhances it; it may just confuse the issue.
This is cool. I'll admit that I didn't understand your work at first, but that doesn't mean i didn't respect it:) At first I thought of it as a revolt against languauge like the dadaists did but now I see it as a celebration of expression by means of revolt against the structures that can tie it down. Please tell me am i right in assuming that? i'll be watching your work for awhile its among most unique i've read as of lately
United we stand. But a house that is divided is the breeding ground of anarchy. Which may or may not be a good thing depending upon the degree of civilization among the populous.
And then went down to the ship, Set keel to breakers, forth on the godly sea, and . . . Ezra Pound (TCOEP).
About
" My life goal? Literary Immortality--without compromise. "
" I would rather be skydiving while writing a book. "
philosopher & polymath
Author of the unpublished masterpiece PROTEAN NotUnTit.. more..